Santa Rosa local fauna
9°29′39″S 72°45′48″W / 9.49417°S 72.76333°W The Santa Rosa local fauna consists of the animals found in the Paleogene fossil site of Santa Rosa in eastern Peru. The age of the Santa Rosa fauna is difficult to determine, but may be Eocene (Mustersan) or Oligocene (Deseadan).
History and context
[edit]Few fossils have been found in the vast rainforests of the Amazon Basin, and Santa Rosa was the first Paleogene fauna to be discovered in the region.[1] The Santa Rosa local fauna was discovered in July 1995, and the discovery was briefly reported in 1996. In 1998, further fossil samples were taken at the site. Though not all of the material had been sorted, a report on the fauna was published in 2004 in a volume edited by Kenneth Campbell of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.[2] The publication was reviewed favorably by Bruce MacFadden in the Journal of Mammalian Evolution.[3]
Location and geology
[edit]The Santa Rosa fossil site is located in eastern Peru's Atalaya Province. It is about 7.0 kilometres (4.3 miles) north of the town of Breu, 7.5 kilometres (4.7 miles) south of the Brazilian border, and 2.0 kilometres (1.2 miles) north of a small village named Santa Rosa. It is on the left (west) bank of the Río Yurúa at an altitude of 215 metres (705 feet).[4] The fossils were found in coarse fluvial deposits that form thin lenses along the bank of the river.[5]
There is a number of similar rock units—so-called "red beds"—in the Tertiary deposits of western Amazonia, including eastern Peru, and it is difficult to assign the isolated Santa Rosa outcrop to any of them.[6] However, Campbell and colleagues suggested on the basis of the stage of evolution of the rodents and marsupials found that Santa Rosa dates to the Mustersan South American Land Mammal Age, which is part of the Eocene. This would make it likely that it is part of the Yahuarango Formation, which may be Cretaceous to Eocene in age. On the other hand, they suggested that Santa Rosa could be younger, perhaps Oligocene, and could fall either into a continuation of the Yahuarango Formation or into the younger Chambira Formation.[7] Indeed, María Vucetich noted in 2010 that some of the Santa Rosa rodents are similar to Deseadan (Oligocene) forms, and the notoungulates also suggest a younger age.[8]
Fauna
[edit]The Santa Rosa local fauna contains mammals, other vertebrates, and some crabs and charophyte algae. Not all of the fossils found at Santa Rosa have been described in detail yet, and not all the material retrieved has been sorted.[9] Full descriptions have been published of the Santa Rosa marsupials,[10] rodents,[11] and notoungulates.[12] Two single teeth that may represent a bat and a gondwanathere have also been described.[13]
Other fossils found at Santa Rosa have not been described in detail. There are some xenarthrans, numerous fish representing at least five families, many crocodilians, some turtles, possibly some lizards, and a few fossils of amphibians and birds. Crab claws found at the site probably represent the family Pseudothelphusiidae.[9]
The marsupial fauna of Santa Rosa is known from 79 isolated teeth, which represent eleven species.[14] The fauna is taxonomically diverse, comprising members of the orders Microbiotheria (represented among living marsupials only by the monito del monte), Paucituberculata (shrew opossums), Didelphimorphia (opossums), and the extinct Sparassodonta and Polydolopimorphia. Two genera, Wirunodon and Kiruwamaq, cannot be assigned to any existing marsupial order.[15] The largest species found, the sparassodont Patene campbelli, was cat-sized, but most species were the size of a mouse. Most Santa Rosa marsupials are thought to have been frugivores and/or insectivores; on the other hand, Patene was a carnivore. The most common species found, the polydolopimorphian Wamradolops tsulludon, shows features that suggest it was adapted for breaking down hard food items such as seeds or bark.[16]
Hundreds of rodent fossils have been found at Santa Rosa, many of which cannot be identified precisely.[17] These rodents are referable to the caviomorph group of rodents, which is unique to the Americas, and includes at least eleven species classified in the families Erethizontidae (New World porcupines), Echimyidae (spiny rats), and Agoutidae (agoutis).[18] All Santa Rosa rodents share a common morphological pattern of the teeth, suggestive of a basal place in the caviomorph radiation.[19]
The extinct "ungulate" order Notoungulata is represented by a few fossils only. Four isolated teeth may represent the same species, a sheep-sized member of the suborder Toxodontia.[20] A single, very small tooth may belong to a member of the toxodont family Notohippidae. A jaw fragment is referable to the family Interatheriidae (suborder Typotheria).[21]
A single damaged lower molar documents the possible presence of a bat at Santa Rosa. The specimen is fragmentary enough that it cannot be identified positively as a bat. It shows some features that suggest a relationship with the living bat family Noctilionidae (bulldog bats).[22] When published, this specimen represented the oldest known South American bat, but an older bat was described from Argentina in 2005.[23]
Another isolated tooth, LACM 149371, cannot be aligned securely with any mammalian group. Francisco Goin and colleagues, who described this specimen, tentatively suggested that it represents an upper molar of a member of the family Ferugliotheriidae, part of the ancient and enigmatic group Gondwanatheria. If this identification is correct, it would be among the youngest known gondwanatheres.[24]
Faunal list
[edit]The following species of mammals have been recorded at Santa Rosa:
- Order Primates[25]
- Suborder Anthropoidea
- Family indeterminate
- Suborder Anthropoidea
- Order indeterminate[26]
- Possibly family Ferugliotheriidae (LACM 149371)
- Order Didelphimorphia (opossums)[10]
- cf. Family Herpetotheriidae
- Genus Rumiodon
- Rumiodon inti
- Rumiodon sp.
- Genus Rumiodon
- cf. Family Herpetotheriidae
- Order Sparassodonta[10]
- Family Hathliacynidae
- Genus Patene
- Family Hathliacynidae
- Order Polydolopimorphia[10]
- Family Prepidolopidae
- Genus Incadolops
- Family indeterminate
- Family Prepidolopidae
- Order Paucituberculata (shrew opossums)[10]
- Family Caenolestidae
- cf. Family Palaeothentidae
- Genus Sasawatsu
- Order Microbiotheria (monito del monte)[10]
- Family Microbiotheriidae
- Marsupialia, order and family indeterminate[10]
- Order Notoungulata[12]
- Suborder Toxodontia
- Family, genus and species indeterminate (perhaps more than one species)
- cf. Family Notohippidae
- Genus and species indeterminate
- Suborder Typotheria
- Family Interatheriidae
- Genus and species indeterminate
- Family Interatheriidae
- Suborder Toxodontia
- Order Rodentia (rodents)[27]
- Family Erethizontidae (New World porcupines)
- Genus Eopululo
- Family Agoutidae (agoutis)
- Genus Eobrasinamys
- Genus Eoincamys
- Genus Eopicure
- Genus and species indeterminate A
- Genus and species indeterminate B
- Genus and species indeterminate C
- Family Echimyidae (spiny rats)
- Genus Eodelphomys
- Genus Eoespina
- Genus Eosachacui
- Genus Eosallamys
- Genus and species indeterminate A
- Genus and species indeterminate B
- Genus and species indeterminate C
- Family Erethizontidae (New World porcupines)
- Order Chiroptera (bats)[28]
- Family, genus, and species indeterminate
References
[edit]- ^ MacFadden 2006, p. 161.
- ^ Campbell 2004, p. 2, Preface.
- ^ MacFadden 2006.
- ^ Campbell, Frailey & Romero-Pittman 2004, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Campbell, Frailey & Romero-Pittman 2004, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Campbell 2004a, pp. 155–156; Campbell 2004, p. 9.
- ^ Campbell, Frailey & Romero-Pittman 2004, pp. 9–11.
- ^ Vucetich et al. 2010, pp. 201–202.
- ^ a b Campbell, Frailey & Romero-Pittman 2004, p. 2.
- ^ a b c d e f g Goin & Candela 2004.
- ^ Frailey & Campbell 2004; Martin 2005.
- ^ a b Shockey, Hitz & Bond 2004.
- ^ Czaplewski & Campbell 2004; Goin et al. 2004.
- ^ Goin & Candela 2004, p. 15.
- ^ Goin & Candela 2004, table 4.
- ^ Goin & Candela 2004, pp. 45–46.
- ^ Frailey & Campbell 2004, p. 94.
- ^ Martin 2005, p. 405.
- ^ Frailey & Campbell 2004, p. 103.
- ^ Shockey, Hitz & Bond 2004, pp. 61, 62, 63.
- ^ Shockey, Hitz & Bond 2004, p. 65.
- ^ Czaplewski & Campbell 2004, p. 141.
- ^ Tejedor et al. 2005, p. 990.
- ^ Goin et al. 2004, pp. 145, 152.
- ^ Bond et al. 2015.
- ^ Goin et al. 2004.
- ^ Frailey & Campbell 2004; Woods & Kilpatrick 2005.
- ^ Czaplewski & Campbell 2004.
Bibliography
[edit]- Bond, Mariano; Tejedor, Marcelo F.; Campbell, Kenneth E. Jr.; Chornogubsky, Laura; Novo, Nelson; Goin, Francisco (2015). "Eocene primates of South America and the African origins of New World monkeys". Nature. 520 (7548): 538–546. doi:10.1038/nature14120. hdl:11336/79088. PMID 25652825.
- Campbell, K.E. (2004). "The Paleogene Mammalian Fauna of Santa Rosa, Amazonian Peru". Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series. 40: 1–163.
- Campbell, Jr. (2004a). "The Santa Rosa local fauna: A summary". Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 155–163.
- Campbell, K.E.; Frailey, C.D.; Romero-Pittman, L. (2004). "The Paleogene Santa Rosa local fauna of Amazonian Perú: geographic and geological setting". Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 3–14.
- Czaplewski, N.J.; Campbell, K.E. (2004). "A possible bat (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from the ?Eocene of Amazonian Perú" (PDF). Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 141–144.
- Frailey, C.D.; Campbell, K.E. (2004). "Paleogene rodents from Amazonian Peru: the Santa Rosa local fauna". Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 71–130.
- Goin, F.J.; Candela, A.M. (2004). "New Paleogene marsupials from the Amazon Basin of eastern Perú". Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 15–60.
- Goin, F.J.; Vieytes, E.C.; Vucetich, M.G.; Carlini, A.A.; Bond, M. (2004). "Enigmatic mammal from the Paleogene of Perú" (PDF). Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 145–153.
- MacFadden, B. J. (2006). "Kenneth E. Campbell Jr, the Paleogene Mammalian Fauna of Santa Rosa, Amazonian Peru". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 13 (2): 161–163. doi:10.1007/s10914-006-9014-6.
- Martin, T. (2005). "Incisor schmelzmuster diversity in South America's oldest rodent fauna and early caviomorph history". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 12 (3–4): 405–417. doi:10.1007/s10914-005-6968-8.
- Shockey, B.J.; Hitz, R.; Bond, M. (2004). "Paleogene notoungulates from the Amazon Basin of Peru" (PDF). Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. 40: 61–69.
- Tejedor, M. F.; Czaplewski, N. J.; Goin, F. J.; Aragón, E. (2005). "The oldest record of South American bats". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25 (4): 990. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0990:TOROSA]2.0.CO;2.
- Vucetich, M.G.; Vieytes, E.C.; Pérez, M.E.; Carloni, A.A. (2010). "The rodents from La Cantera and the early evolution of caviomorphs in South America". In Madden, R.H.; Carlini, A.A.; Vucetich, M.G.; et al. (eds.). The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change Through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 193–205. ISBN 978-0-521-87241-6.
- Woods, C.A.; Kilpatrick, C.W. (2005). "Infraorder Hystricognathi". In Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1538–1600. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0.